? regarding changing reporting method

From: Roxanne Finney (rmfinney@nic.edu)
Date: Tue Sep 23 2003 - 17:40:51 EDT

  • Next message: sburns@smcvt.edu: "RE: ? regarding changing reporting method"

    Hello to all of those out there in Bursarland,

    Here at North Idaho College (a 2 year community college of about 4,500
    students), we are planning to switch from reporting the paid amount to
    reporting the billed amount. We in the past few years have actually
    been entering the amount paid in box 1. We are switching reporting
    methods, since we know we are switching software in the next couple of
    years to Datatel, which uses the charged/billed amount. We are
    basically rewriting the 1098-T reporting portion of our program we use
    now, which is SBI reflections based software. Are there any colleges
    out there with the following situation? Any assistance would be greatly
    appreciated.

    The following question is a question that our Computer Service Dept. has
    and I am unsure of the answer?

    Are we applying a strict definition of calendar year for the 2003 tax
    reporting year since we are switching methods of reporting? I recommend
    doing that, but there is an issue. Students who registered for Spring
    in November 2002 were billed in November 2002 at time of registration.
    If they waited to pay until January 2003, they won't get credit this
    year for Spring tuition/fees since we're switching methods from payments
    received to amounts billed. Students will get credit for Spring
    registrations for 2004 that happen this coming November no matter when
    they pay. Should we explain this in our cover letter and/or web page?
    I can probably come up with an ad-hoc report that would identify the
    group of students and the dollars involved if you would like.

    Thank you,

    Roxanne Finney, Bursar
    North Idaho College
    rmfinney@nic.edu
    208-666-8003


  • Next message: sburns@smcvt.edu: "RE: ? regarding changing reporting method"

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Wed Sep 24 2003 - 08:19:06 EDT